Research and a 3 year vision for interview scheduling

It had been years since the team had been able to increase the number of interviews scheduled through Indeed. We set out to fix it.

Dialog box for scheduling an interview with Sam Kirwa for a Cafe Manager role via Indeed. Left side shows interview details: 15 minutes, phone call, interviewer Meg Fee, and phone screen guide.
when
Mar 2023
team
Me (designer)
Product Manager
Research Lead
Eng Lead
focus
user research, product strategy, interaction design

I have other things to do… scheduling interviews is a pain and takes forever

I send a lot of interview invites and don’t get many confirmations

We get sooo many no-shows to interviews

what kept coming up

The same three complaints, over and over

They showed up in research, in customer feedback, everywhere. So we did one more round of generative research, starting from a list of open questions about how employers really schedule.

Google Docs page showing a research protocol document with interview questions about scheduling workflows.
what we learned

Three things we didn’t expect

More messaging = fewer no-shows?!

“Are we still on for tomorrow?” Employers who talked with jobseekers before inviting them saw fewer no-shows than the ones who just sent an invite.

Wait, Indeed already has this?

Employers kept wishing for things we already had: availability-based scheduling (like Calendly), calendar sync that suggests open slots, and automated reminders.

Their availability, up front

Later interviews are with leaders whose calendars are rough. With the jobseeker’s availability up front, employers could offer colleagues options instead of playing telephone.

our 3 year plan

Get Indeed out of the way

Most of the concepts were anchored in messaging. We believed more human-to-human connection would do more for employers than more tools.

What if we collected availability while they applied?

It could make later interviews easier to schedule, and save some back and forth on screener calls too.

Notice when they’re about to schedule by hand

When an employer is about to go down an arduous manual path, nudge them toward our tools to save them the time.

Make it easier for the jobseeker to confirm

Let both sides act right inside messaging, so nothing gets lost in a sea of other screens. Keep the focus on the conversation.

that was fun…

…but where do we start?

We roughly mapped two to three years of experiments, then picked the ones we could ship first.

First, fix what was broken.

more at Indeed

Handing off the scheduling work

We were just building momentum, with two or three years of experiments roughly mapped out, when the company went through widespread reorgs.

I moved to the messaging team and handed scheduling over to another designer on our scheduling platform team.

thanks for stopping by

got a project in mind? say hi